Hillary paid Facebook to rig elections while colluding with Russian Uranium One


Hillary paid Facebook to rig elections while colluding with RussianUranium One

Citizens Intelligence Report by the American Intelligence Media
Crime 1: Her private email server hid unpublished 2009-2010 StateDepartment contracts with Facebook managed by Dmitry Shevelenko.
Crime 2: Hillary’s Facebook “election winning template” clearlyviolates The Hatch Act.
Crime 3: Hillary’s contracts obstructed justice in Leader v. Facebook.
Crime 4: Hillary colluded with Facebook to set State Department Internetpolicy.

Oct. 26, 2017—On May 26, 2009, Russian oligarch Yuri Milner invested $200 million inFacebook private stock brokered by his Russian partner Goldman Sachs. Milner had worked for Obama’s 2008 bailout director Larry H.Summers when he was chief economist for the World Bank in the early 1990’s as a researcher along with Sheryl K. Sandberg,who later became Summer’s chief of staff at the U.S. Treasury, then started Gmail and is now Facebook’s chief operating officer. WhileSandberg started Gmail for Google, Milner started Mail.ru. The intent to takeover global communications is evident in hindsight.

On Jun. 16, 2009, Hillary Clinton approved the Vladimir Putin-controlledROSATOM to purchase 20% of America’s uranium reserves through Uranium One. The Clinton Foundation had already received more than$145 million in pay-to-play donations from Uranium One beneficiaries.

Hillary’s treason in her compromise of America’s energy reserves usingRussian surrogates is evident. That treason is compounded by a simultaneous $1 billion financing by Cisco, Intel and Google of Vladimir Putin’s Moscow, Russia technology center Skolkovo onJun. 27, 2010, just two days before Hillary approved the uranium sale to ROSATOM. See also “Cisco Commits $1 Billion for Multi-year Investment inSkolkovo.” ThinkRUSSIA. Aug. 11, 2010.

On Jun. 29, 2010, just two days after the Cisco/Intel/Google $1 billiondonation, Moscow-based Renaissance Capital paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech even though Renaissance was the lead analyst coveringrecommending a “buy” on Uranium One. On Mar. 30, 2011, Russian oligarch Yuri Milner overpaid $100 million for a gaudymansion in the center of Silicon Valley in an ostentatious display of a rogue C.I.A.-inspired arrogance, after his $200 million privateFacebook investment.

What is becoming equally evident is Hillary’s simultaneous compromise ofAmerica’s elections, digital networks and court proceedings through secret “election winning template” contracts with Facebook usingRussian surrogates.

On Sep. 26, 2009, Hillary Clinton and the State Department entered into a secretcontract with Facebook for $120,000 (GSA SAQMMA09M1870) to build “a template for winning elections using advanced Facebook marketing.”The next month, on Oct. 16, 2009, Hillary promoted Facebook on a video presentation to a U.S. StateDepartment-funded Alliance for Youth Movements Summit in Mexico City. This contract was not known because Hillary had hidden it on herprivate email server in the basement of her house. It first came to light through the dogged work of Judicial Watch who obtained it inApr. 03, 2014.

See also TIMELINE.

(Note: The Timeline takes a few minutes to download because of its filesize. It may be too large to load on your phone or tablet so serious researchers should use a PC for download. It’s worth the effort!You will know it is open when red bordered boxes appear on the screen.)


Facebook contract with Office of Economic Security Information Programs

Between Sep. 26, 2009 and Sep. 30, 2010, Hillary entered into three (3) contracts with Facebook for $385,000.

This collusion with Facebook was wantonly criminal on many levels.

Columbus innovator Leader Technologies, Inc. was suing Facebook for patentinfringement on Nov. 19, 2008 in Delaware federal district court. Reagan-appointed judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. was assigned the case.

While the case was preparing for trial, and despite four motions to compel,Mark Zuckerberg stonewalled providing his 2003-2004 Harvard computer devices and emails for review in the case. We now know that hisattorneys at Gibson Dunn LLP had custody of 28 Harvard computer hard drives and emails. After stonewalling for a year, they lied to thecourt and said they had lost the information.

We believe Facebook and Zuckerberg hid this information because it willprove that Zuckerberg is a mere stooge of the rogue C.I.A. and was given the programming code from the IBM Eclipse Foundation to startFacebook. It will prove that IBM was given the code from James P. Chandler, III who stole it from his legal client Leader Technologies,Inc.

What Leader had no way of knowing was that Chandler was working intimatelyat the highest level with the Secretary for the Department of Defense’s Highlands Forum to weaponize the Internet. He heldillegal private meetings with favored private companies to set policy on how the Internet would be controlled and profited from by themilitary-industrial complex.

This cabal of military-industrial complex criminals have used Leader’sinvention for 17 years for free. Leader’s shareholders across the country are starting to file Miller Act Notice to demand that President Donald Trump pay them for using theirproperty without compensation.

While Zuckerberg was openly lying to the court, Hillary Clinton and theState Department  entered into secret contracts with Facebook to build “a template for winning elections using advanced Facebookmarketing.” These contracts were managed by “Dmitry Shevelenko” whose Russian background has been obscured by the shadow government.

Obstruction of Justice 

In American courts, litigants have a solemn right to a fair trial.Litigants have the right to assume that no government representative will use their position of public trust to interfere in the case infavor of either side. When a government representative interferes in a case, that crime is called “obstruction of justice” for obviousreasons. Those interfering are attempting to influence the outcome of the case in favor of one of the parties.

Election tampering 

In American elections, citizens have a solemn right to a free and fairelection. Citizens have the right to assume that no government representative will use their position of public trust to interferein an election in favor of either candidate. When a government representative interferes in an election, that crime is called“election tampering” and is a violation of The Hatch Act.

Fraud & Racketeering 

In American public contracts, citizens have a solemn right totransparency regarding the spending of public funds. Except in special circumstances, government representatives may not use theirposition of public trust to favor certain private parties in uncompetitive contracts. When a government representative enters intono-bid contracts and colludes with the General Service Agency (GSA) to hide the existence of those contracts, that crime is called“fraud.” When such fraud involves parties across state lines, that crime is “racketeering.”

Pay Leader for 17 years of free use of their social networking invention; federal governmentcan raise $200-500+ billion in surcharge revenues from social networking without raising taxes!

In conclusion, the crimes described above alone are enough by themselvesto convict an average American of racketeering and treason. The evidence of these crimes come from Hillary Clinton’s private emailserver.

The Russian collusion nexus between Uranium One and Facebook electionrigging is stunning.

Readers are encouraged to get this article to your elected representatives.

Ask them to: (1) pay Leader Technologies for the last 17 years of freeuse of their social networking invention that Hillary obstructed, and (2) prosecute Hillary and her racketeers for her Uranium One anddigital election rigging racketeering and treason.


They posted on the same topic

Trackback URL : https://topnewsglobal.net/index.php?trackback/27

This post's comments feed