LEAK: Google Employees Defend Discrimination Against Conservatives

google sucks.png

LEAK: Google Employees Defend Discrimination Against Conservatives

by Allum Bokhari3 Nov 20173288



CNN recently published an in-depth piece exploring bias against conservatives in SiliconValley. Internal discussions at Google, leaked exclusively to Breitbart News shine further light on the problem, revealing thatconservative Googlers who voice concerns about political bias are often belittled and ignored by fellow employees.


A majority of Google employees have stated that the company culture hasnot improved since they joined the company, in an anonymous internal poll conducted shortly after the firing of viewpoint diversity advocate James Damore. In screengrabs of the discussionbelow the poll, one employee states a more specific concern: political intolerance.

Google “throwing money around to silence its critics” is an allegationthe company has faced before, from left-wingers and mainstream journalists as well as right-wingers. Itwas the employee’s comments about political correctness, however, that caused ire from his colleagues, one of whom suggested he simplyleave the company.

One colleague intervened, saying the comment was “no more appropriate”than telling a gay worker he would be happier if he quit his job.

Another poster interjected, comparing the statement to telling a woman forcedto wear a headscarf at work to just shut up and accept it.

The original poster then returned to the thread, stating that he couldn’teven “keep his head down and work” at the company.

Another employee entered the conversation to reject the call for viewpointdiversity, telling his fellow Googler that he thought the company would be better off without him. “A culture which makes you feeluncomfortable is indeed making Google a better place,” stated the employee.

The attitude appears to reflect that of other Google employees, includingmanagers, who openly called for supporters of James Damore to be fired and blacklisted in the wake of theviewpoint diversity controversy.

Later in the thread, a Jill Stein voter admitted that conservatives whocomplained about political discrimination at Google had a point. “The situation at Google is completely out of control,” says theemployee.

Now the problems have leaked out into the press and I fear they areirreparably harming the company’s reputation.”

Bombshell: Twitter, Google Admit Deliberately Censoring News

“Fake news” being used as a weaponized term to bury opposing viewpoints

Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - Comments


Bombshell: Twitter, Google Admit Deliberately Censoring Infowars

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing into Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election, TwitterGeneral Counsel Sean Edgett brazenly admitted that Twitter censors Infowars stories in favor of mainstream media.

Edgett was asked by Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL) why an Infowars story about New York Mayor Mike De Blasio ignoring warnings from an Imam about terrorist radicalization in New York appeared at thetop of the #NYCTerroristAttack hashtag during the vehicle attack in Manhattan last week.

“This is a real-time example of when we talk about this information being weaponized, how quickly can you act and what’syour responsibility to set the record straight so that the people who saw this know that it’s fake news?” asked Quigley, adding thatTwitter needed to prevent Infowars “spreading like some sort of virus through the legitimate world.”

Twitter Sean Edgett responded by telling Quigley, “The system self-corrected, that shouldn’t be the first tweet yousee anymore, it should be a USA Today article,” before going on to assure the Congressman that only “verified accounts” and“accurate information and reporting” (in other words mainstream media only) would be seen in future.

Infowars was also attacked on Sunday when the media started apressure campaign to have Google de-list my tweets from appearing in search results about breaking news stories. Google responded by saying they would “make some changes” to ensure this didn’t happen again.

The New York Times contacted me for a comment and I made it clear that there is no “strategy” for getting my tweetsto the top of Google’s rankings – I am simply interesting and have a lot of followers. The threat of a different perspective is sothreatening to the MSM and the left that they are now directly demanding tech companies bury our content in real time.

Hoping I get quoted on that. pic.twitter.com/wI7OlEW3bE
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 7, 2017

The story cited by Congressman Quigley in the clip above was also labeled “fake news” despite being completely true.

An Imam – Mohammad Tawhidi – did indeed warn De Blasio about terrorists being radicalized in New York andsubsequently posted the letter to prove it.

RELEASED: My Feb 2016 letter to Mayor de Blasio warning him of terrorist breeding in NYC. I was completelyignored! https://t.co/IbDcFp92mD pic.twitter.com/ul5TpIcs6L
— Imam Tawhidi (@Imamofpeace) November 2, 2017

He also felt that De Blasio ignored his warnings because he was too busy wasting “all his energy and resources intrying to bring down President Trump and not Islamic Extremists.”

Not a single aspect of this story is “fake news,” it simply makes De Blasio look bad – and that’s the point.

As Rep. Chris Stewart (R-UT) pointed out in the hearing, “fake news” is completely subjective. “How in theworld do you intend to identify fake news without weaponizing this in the political realm?” he asked.

The entire “fake news” moral panic was an invention of the Democrats as an excuse because they lost theelection, when in reality, a Stanford University study found that fake news (actual fake news websites publishing made up stories) did not influence the election and thatthe most widely believed fake news stories actually benefited Hillary Clinton.

Fake news is a weapon being used by the left to push censorship of anything that challenges their dogma or debunks theirarguments, and Silicon Valley has indicated its willingness to jump in bed with Democrats to ensure that very outcome.


Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71


ai weapons


Image Source: US Navy

When Google AI rules, one rogue Millennial programmer could end the human race

Mike Wehner @MikeWehner

The idea of small groups of humans having control over some of the most powerful weapons ever to be built is scary, but it’s the reality we live in. In the not-so-distant future, that incredible power and responsibility could be handed over to AI and robotic systems, which are already in active development. In a pair of open letters to the prime ministers of bother Australia and Canada, hundreds of AI researchers and scientists are pleading for that not to happen.

The fear, they say, is that removing the human element from life and death decisions could usher in a destructive age that ultimately spells the end of mankind. The AI weapons systems are, as the researchers put it, “weapons of mass destruction” which must be banned outright before they can do any serious damage.



Don't Miss You’ll have a Super NES Classic in your hands next week if you to pay a premium on Amazon


“Delegating life-or-death decisions to machines crosses a fundamental moral line – no matter which side builds or uses them,” the letter explains. “Playing Russian roulette with the lives of others can never be justified merely on the basis of efficacy. This is not only a fundamental issue of human rights. The decision whether to ban or engage autonomous weapons goes to the core of our humanity.”

In a setting where computers have the ultimate say in whether or not to engage in hostile acts — even under the guise of defending their own territories or protecting the populations they are programmed to protect — conflicts could escalate much faster than humans have ever seen. Weeks, months, or even years of posturing and diplomacy could turn into mere minutes or even seconds, with missiles flying before humans can even begin to intervene. And then, of course, there’s the issue of the AI being manipulated in unforeseen ways.

“These will be weapons of mass destruction,” the scientists say. “One programmer will be able to control a whole army. Every other weapon of mass destruction has been banned: chemical weapons, biological weapons, even nuclear weapons. We must add autonomous weapons to the list of weapons that are morally unacceptable to use.”

It’s a frightening thought, but it hasn’t stopped military contractors from exploring the possibility of AI-controlled weapons and defense systems. This could be yet another way mankind engineers its own destruction.

They posted on the same topic

Trackback URL : https://topnewsglobal.net/index.php?trackback/46

This post's comments feed